"Speaking at a graduation ceremony in Haret Hreik, Nasrallah announced on October 22, 2002: "if they [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide."[4][5] The New York Times qualifies this as "genocidal thinking"[6], whereas the New York Sun likens it to the 1992 Hezbollah statement, which vowed, "It is an open war until the elimination of Israel and until the death of the last Jew on earth."[7] Michael Rubin qualifies his goal as genocide too, quoting Nasrallah ruling out "co-existence with" the Jews or "peace", as "they are a cancer which is liable to spread again at any moment."
"If we searched the entire world for a person more cowardly, despicable, weak and feeble in psyche, mind, ideology and religion, we would not find anyone like the Jew. Notice, I do not say the Israeli. (New Yorker, Oct. 14, 2002)
"Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of other countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world.. .. But those who study Islamic Holy \War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world. . . . Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those who say this are witless.
"Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender [to the enemy]?
"Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors! There are hundreds of other [Qur'anic] psalms and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight.
"Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim." -- Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Revolutionary Founder of Clerical-Fascist Iran and the most influential Shiite cleric in the last 1000 years.
PART ONE:
INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS
A Reminder: What the Current Series on Iran Is About
Both today's article and the one last week deal, as it happens, with the same high-octane topic --- the screw-loose religious fanaticism of Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; and both, as it also happens, are part of a long series on Iran's nuclear ambitions and their weighty implications for the Middle East and US foreign policy. Our chief concern: can a terror-state --- armed with nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction and led, since July 2005, by a frenzied cocksure religious zealot who favors Holy War and praises death by martyrdom --- be reliably deterred by the US and others in, say, the ways the Soviet Union was during the cold war?
Deterred from What?
Another key question, no? The answer: deterred from several things that would threaten major American interests and regional stability in the Middle East.
Among those threats --- though probably the least likely --- is that Iran's clerical-fascist regime would use the nuclear weapons in a surprise first-strike against Israel or against US military forces in the region. Even though that threat can't be ruled out, implementing it would entail sure-fire national suicide for Iran by means of Israeli or American nuclear retaliation, and the likelier threats lie elsewhere. Above all, a nuclear-armed Iran might pursue a series of aggressive foreign and military policies charged with reckless, high-risk gambles of the sort, say, that Hitler or the Japanese militarists tempted fate with at the start of WWII. Such hazardous long-shots, to be precise, like trying . . .
-
To dominate the Middle East;
-
To multiply Iran's long-standing nurture and support for jihadi terrorist movements like Hezbollah and Hamas in reckless adventurous ways;
-
To encourage those terrorists to attack Israel with chemical and biological weapons or maybe with crude radioactive suitcase bombs, and maybe US allies in Europe or elsewhere . . . including the US itself. Hezbollah itself, recall, is a global terrorist movement that has been operating in the Middle East, Europe, North America, and Latin America for over two decades now . . . long before anybody ever heard of al Qaeda
-
And, not least, to make Iran the benighted, oil-rich head of global jihadi Islamist movements everywhere, whether Shiite or Sunni.
Wait! ---don't the two major groups of Muslims fear and hate one another? Yes; but then inflamed Islamo-fascists are still fascists and Muslims, and both Shiite and Sunni terrorists share frenzied jihadi aims and a common enemy: Jews, Israel, Jew-dominated America, Jew-run globalization, the US's running dog Western allies, Orthodox Russia, hateful Hindu India, pagan Buddhist Thailand, the Christian Philippines, and of course treacherous Muslim collaborators in power and elsewhere.
Those who think that an all-inclusive jihadi alliance is impossible might ponder why the Communist Soviet Union ended up as a key ally in World War II of democratic and capitalist Britain and America.
What Stable Deterrence Entails
We know a lot about the conditions that underpinned stable nuclear deterrence during the cold war between the super-powers, such as rational decision-making by the deterring and target-states. Will these complex conditions --- mental, political, military, and technological --- apply to a nuclear-armed Iran that's led by a rabid religious zealot, actively supports jihadi terrorists in Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Syria, and elsewhere, and will likely tap its oil-riches to try placing itself at the head of all global Islamo-fascist terrorist movements?
We have to be honest. No simple at-the-ready answer is possible here.




